Lease Extensions and Enfranchisement Claims

What is the “2 Year Rule” and Why is it Being Scrapped for Lease Extensions and Enfranchisement?

On 23rd January 2025 Housing Minister, Matthew Pennicock, signed regulations to remove the ‘two year registered ownership’ requirement, bringing into force the first part of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 on 1st February 2025.

04 Mar 2025

Under the original Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 (‘the Act’) leaseholders were required to have been the registered proprietor for at least two years before being able to exercise a statutory lease extension under the Act.  This ‘two-year rule’ has posed problems for those who have been purchasing leases with a low unexpired term remaining on a lease.  This triggered a complex, and sometimes difficult procedure, whereby the seller and current tenant of a leasehold property would need to agree to serve a Section 42 Notice between exchange and completion in order to circumvent the ‘2-year rule’ and commence a statutory lease extension for the benefit of the buyer. The Notice would then be assigned to the buyer post completion.  This added another layer of complexity to conveyancing transactions and often slowed them down.

With this rule abolished it means those purchasing leasehold property who wish to extend the lease can serve notice as soon as completion takes place on their landlord, triggering the statutory procedure of procuring a lease extension (currently adding an additional 90 years plus the unexpired term at a peppercorn ground rent). In turn; this gives leaseholders more bargaining power with their landlords and, leaseholders who fall short of the ‘2-year rule’ no longer have to rely on informal lease extensions where landlords could propose more onerous terms for a lease, or indeed refuse a lease extension altogether.

Further to this, delays at HM Land Registry in registrations have meant that often leaseholders would have to wait more than two years as the rules related to the date of registration and not the date of transfer.

The ‘2-year rule’ is also being abolished in enfranchisement, meaning that leaseholders of blocks of flats who have been the registered proprietors for less than 2 years can also now join in a collective enfranchisement claim. This can be viewed as a benefit not only for that immediate leaseholder but for the collective leaseholders as there are more individuals to split the cost of enfranchisement.

The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 looks to radically change the face of lease extensions and enfranchisement. This change will no doubt pave the way for leaseholders’ rights to be enhanced in the future.

M&P Commentary

Shelley Fitzpatrick, Senior Associate Solicitor in our Residential Property team, said:

“This change offers leaseholders or prospective buyers of leases with a low number of unexpired years some hope and seeks to make the process easier for buyers and sellers.  However, leaseholders will still need to take into consideration the stringent requirements of lenders who may insist that a lease extension is completed on completion of a sale in any event to ensure that the unexpired term of the lease at completion of the mortgage complies with their requirements.

I am a specialist solicitor within the area of lease extensions and enfranchisement.  I currently act for both landlords and leaseholders in relation to lease extension and enfranchisement claims. Please feel free to contact me if you would like to discuss anything further. Contact our Romford office on 01708 784000 for more information.”

OUR CLIENTS SAY ABOUT US

Ranked highly in Romford and Brentwood for solicitor firms

Family
The service I received from Allison was exceptional. Always highly professional and informative.
Virginia
Wills
Mullis and Peake are very efficient, professional and friendly company to deal with. Excellent service throughout.
Brian
Employment
Excellent, swift service from Esther at Mullis & Peake. Showed clear expertise in her field & walked me through everything patiently & thoroughly.
Dan
Company and Commercial
I found the service provided was excellent from start to finish, with our requirements met in a timely manner throughout.
Gary
Wills
Staff very helpful and friendly. Trudi was easy to talk to and to understand the procedure.
Pamela
Dispute resolution
We contacted Martyn to deal with a sensitive Will dispute and we can’t thank him enough for his commitment and hard work.
Salena
Residential Property
Very prompt. Experienced. Expert. Friendly.
Trevor
Commercial Property
Excellent service and far quicker than previous negotiations using a different solicitor.
John
Family
At all times I was kept informed about the progress of the case and everything was completed in a timely fashion.
Melanie
Personal Injury
Martyn undertook and guided me through the lengthy process [of a personal injury case], and after much work, achieved a successful result.
Shirley